Fracking causing more harm than good essay

Paul, as saying "the big threats to public health are in wastewater pits and storage and also during transportation when you are trucking around contaminated water One need only recall the former federal agency in charge of collecting oil and gas royalties on public lands, the Minerals Management Service.

The pumping produces a split shale so that the natural gas can flow. A article in the journal, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, examined the potential health impacts of oil and gas drilling in relation to the chemicals used during drilling, fracking, processing,and delivery of natural gas.

Potential Health and Environmental Effects of Hydrofracking in the Williston Basin, Montana

It has resulted in a large outcry, to which the politicians on the state and federal levels have responded. Nevertheless, many of the health risks from the toxins used during the fracking process do not express themselves immediately, and require studies looking into long-term health effects.

Because of that, fracking is looked at as being the only viably way to keep the profit in drilling. A large amount of natural gas has been obtained through fracking in recent years that the United States carbon production are declining.

Their basic conclusions were: If effective environmental action is not taken today, the possible consequences from fracking will grow into a more serious problem.

Fracking wells and shale gas are currently less expensive than coal in the United States. The main concern that this writer believe both groups of American are there sufficient regulations now in place to ensure safety.

Of the known chemicals associated with fracking, "at least half of the chemicals known to be present in fracking fluid are toxic, many of them are carcinogens, neurotoxins, endocrine disruptors, and mutagens. The issues environmentalist has with fracking lies in the removal method.

The Associated Press also recently reported that the amount of chemically tainted soil from drilling waste increased nearly 5, percent over the past decade, to more thantons last year. Due to increases in technology and the different chemical compounds that have become more readily available for commercial use, it is becoming easier to destroy rock in this matter.

Researchers at the Colorado School of Public Health, University of Coloradoanalyzed existing research of exposure to conventional petroleum hydrocarbons in occupational settings, and residences near refineries, in conjunction with known pollutants associated with fracking nonconventionalin order to assess health risks to those residents living near fracking operations.

About this resource This Engineering essay was submitted to us by a student in order to help you with your studies.

Free Engineering essays

The EPA is exploring different disposal methods used by industry to safeguard regulatory and ensure frameworks are in place to provide safe and legal options for disposal of flow-back and produced water.

A high percentage of fracking fluid made with water flows back up the well, and is collected in open pits until it can be sent to a treatment plant Is Fracking a Good Idea?

That leads to the main question that must be asked if fracking is to really be addressed and considered: They have introduced and enacted several regulations, along with legislation on the monitoring, the transportation, and the proper disposal of the fracking fluid.

This allows the gasses to leak through the cracks to be effectively captured and stored for use. However, the chemicals and the used water that are left behind after the fracking process has been completed have a possibility of contaminating the surrounding ground, well water, and overall environment, resulting in health concerns.

Bob Weinhold further states that the average well depth has increased from 4, in to 6, feet in Search our thousands of essays: This allows the petroleum product in the well to flow more easily, and more will flow from the well, resulting in more profit. That means they would be playing a losing and unsuccessful game.

Health impacts from fracking are only now being examined by health experts, since such large-scale drilling is a recent phenomenon. The companies, of course, all claim that their recipes are trade secrets, and thus not to be told in public.

This outcry has led many politicians to vote for regulations and legislation at the state and local levels. This secrecy has made it nearly impossible to provide any kind of accurate reading regarding the effects that these chemicals might have up the surrounding environment and human society.

Many laws have loopholes when it comes to fracking. These extra chemicals are the driving force behind the debate on the safety of fracking, primarily due to the secretive nature of what is being used. When this issue occurs they find their way to the surface through accidents at the well heads that pushes fluids to the surface.

This increase in use has caused environmentalists to notice, and to start looking for research on whether or not the practice is safe.

This may seem contradictory that the companies that use fracking do not have to reveal the contents of their fracking chemicals but when the companies that produce household cleaning products must disclose detail contents of the chemicals they use.

Portier, PhD, has called for health studies to be published. The Environmental Protection Agency EPA initially under an emergency administrative order forced three oil production companies operating on the Fort Peck Reservation, to reimburse the city of Poplar, MT for water infrastructure expenditures incurred as a result of drilling contamination.

They also interviewed the owners' veterinarians, and examined the results of water, soil, and air testing as well as the results of laboratory tests on affected animals and their owners. Fracking can produce airborne pollutants like methane, benzene, and sulfur oxide Is Fracking a Good Idea?

Howarth and Anthony Ingraffea, visit the site posted by Nature.Why Social Networks Have Done More Harm Than Good in Our Society.

Fracking: Causing More Harm Than Good Essay Words | 5 Pages. the question: “what hydraulic fracturing or fracking is?” was asked to the average person, depending on their location their answer could vary.

Most likely though most or many people would not know what. Methane is a main component of natural gas and is 25 times more potent in trapping heat in the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. A recent study by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) monitoring gas wells in Weld County, Colorado, estimated that 4 percent of the methane produced by these wells is escaping into the atmosphere.

Advancing the World, Together

Fracking Essays - Fracking: Causing More Harm Than Good. Fracking: Causing More Harm Than Good Essay - If the question: “what hydraulic fracturing or fracking is?” was asked to the average person, depending on their location their answer could vary.

Most likely though most or many people would not know what Fracking truly is but most would say that they have heard at least a little about it from. Fracking: Causing More Harm Than Good Essay - If the question: “what hydraulic fracturing or fracking is?” was asked to the average person, depending on their location their answer could vary.

Most likely though most or many people would not know what Fracking truly is but most would say that they have heard at least a little about it from.

As such, Christopher Bateman claims that "more than 90% of natural-gas wells today use fracking." Fracking and Safety Concerns Fracking, and more specifically fracking fluid, has lead the country into a huge debate regarding the safety of this practice.

Download
Fracking causing more harm than good essay
Rated 4/5 based on 34 review